Gregory C. Krug, as an Individual, a Partner in Krug Investments and a Beneficiary of the George Charles Krug Trust v. A. Philip Lomonaco

2 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory C. KRUG, as an Individual, a Partner in Krug Investments and a Beneficiary of the George Charles Krug Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. Philip LOMONACO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. 1 Decided Aug. 5, 1993. Before: BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gregory C. Krug appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against A. Philip Lomonaco for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and vacate and remand. 3 The facts of this case are contained in pleadings and affidavits submitted by the parties which are in many respects conflicting. The district court made no findings of fact. Therefore, we review the materials de novo to determine if Krug has made a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction, treating his allegations as true except where they are…