Randy Allen Myers v. James Rowland

2 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randy Allen MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15199. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1993. * Decided July 7, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-90-00622-DFL; David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randy Allen Myers, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing for failure to state a claim his claims for (1) deprivation of his property in violation of the takings clause of the fifth amendment and (2) violation of his right to substantive due process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Dep't, 839 F.2d 621 , 623 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 Myers was incarcerated at…