United States v. Lamone Bullard

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamone BULLARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50744. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 5, 1993. Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lamone Bullard appeals his sentence of 12 months, imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, following his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 35(c). 1 Bullard claims, first, that the district court was not authorized to impose a 12-month term of imprisonment in lieu of the illegal, "split" sentence of which he complained, and second, that his corrected sentence was imposed without due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. A. Rule 35 3 We review the legality of a sentence de novo. United States v. Pomazi, 851 F.2d 244, 247 (9th Cir.1988). Given cause, a district court may…