United States v. Alejandro Garcia

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30384. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 3, 1993. Decided Aug. 10, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Alejandro Garcia appeals his felon in possession of a firearm conviction, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1), and his sentence of 15 years imprisonment and five years supervised release, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (e). He argues that (1) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance; (2) the court improperly admonished defense counsel; (3) Bureau of Indian Affairs dispatch logs should have been excluded from evidence; (4) newly discovered evidence warranted a new trial; and (5) the court erred in sentencing him to the mandatory minimum. We affirm. 1. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel A. Motion in Limine 3 Garcia argues that his trial counsel rendered…