United States v. Bethsua Carreon-Smith
Opinion
Opinion
2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bethsua CARREON-SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 5, 1993. Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bethsua Carreon-Smith appeals her convictions, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . Carreon-Smith contends the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 "In determining whether the evidence was sufficient to support ... [Carreon-Smith's] convictions, we must determine whether, after viewing all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime(s) beyond a reasonable…