Frances F. Shand v. University of Ca, Regents, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frances F. SHAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF CA, REGENTS, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. Decided July 7, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frances F. Shand appeals pro se from the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of her Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") complaint alleging that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the University of California (collectively "Livermore") harassed her in retaliation for filing a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). Shand contends the district court erred by finding that she failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We review de novo, Arcade Water District v. United States, 940 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.1991), and we…