United States v. Tyquan David Hakim, A/K/A Tyrone Killingsworth

Good Law
2 F.3d 1158·1993 WL 259466·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28236
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 199392-50355California230 words

Opinion

Opinion

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyquan David HAKIM, a/k/a Tyrone Killingsworth, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50355. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1993. * Decided July 8, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tyquan David Hakim appeals his sixty-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 , 2113(a). 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hakim's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. 4 The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the sentence is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.