United States v. David Lee Laskiewicz

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee LASKIEWICZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-37012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 2, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** David Lee Laskiewicz appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Laskiewicz was sentenced to ten years imprisonment following his guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. The district court determined that Laskiewicz's motion was successive. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 and review de novo. United States v. Moore, 921 F.2d 207, 209 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. A sentencing court is not required "to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same…