Frank Tozzolina, Jr. v. County of Orange

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank TOZZOLINA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56370. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1993. Decided July 8, 1993. 1 Before NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff, Frank Tozzolina, Jr., ("Tozzolina") appeals the district court's denial of his motion for summary judgment, the dismissal of defendant Morrison, and the grant of the remaining defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. WE AFFIRM. 4 * We review a district court's decision to dismiss a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) de novo. Moore v. City of Costa Mesa, 886 F.2d 260, 262 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 906 (1990). 5 We review the district court's decision to dismiss without leave to amend for abuse of discretion. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department, 901 F.2d 696, 701 (9th Cir.1990); Hall…