United States v. Kevin L. Barth

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin L. BARTH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10465. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 5, 1993. Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin L. Barth appeals his convictions and sentence following a jury trial for five counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 . 3 Counsel for Barth submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identifies four possible issues for review: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support Barth's convictions; (2) whether the district court erred by admitting evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 803(6) (Records of regularly conducted activities); (3) whether the district court erred by refusing to exclude evidence which was not disclosed during discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.Proc. 16(a)(1)(C); and (4) whether the…