United States v. John Alex Augborne

2 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Alex AUGBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50762. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 5, 1993. Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANUM ** 2 John Alex Augborne appeals his 264-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to being a felon in possesion of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Augborne contends the district court erred by relying upon unfounded inferences about his criminal history when imposing sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 While lawful sentences within the applicable sentencing guideline range are generally not appealable, due process requires that the defendant's sentence be based upon accurate information. United States v. Jones, 982 F.2d 380, 385 (9th Cir.1992). Augborne argues that his sentence was…