United States v. Wayne Naplin, United States of America v. Wayne Newsom

2 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne NAPLIN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne NEWSOM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30361, 92-30376. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 4, 1993. Before CANBY, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We conclude that the district court did not err in refusing to suppress the marijuana seized at Naplin's residence. Given the totality of circumstances in this case, we hold that Judge Edwards had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. See United States v. Miller, 753 F.2d 1475, 1479 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Ayers, 924 F.2d 1468, 1478 (9th Cir.1991) (this court shows deference to issuing judge's probable cause determination.) 3 Clark's reliability and the basis of her knowledge were established. She provided a detailed description of the proposed…