United States v. Judy Santiago Smith, United States of America v. Rosemary Smith

2 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Judy Santiago SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosemary SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No.s 92-50115, 92-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1992. Decided July 7, 1993. Before BROWNING, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Judy Smith appeals her conviction and sentence for conspiring to tamper with and retaliate against a witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 (conspiracy), 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1512 (b)(1) and (b)(3) (tampering), and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1513 (a)(2) (retaliation). Codefendant, Rosemary Smith, appeals her conviction and sentence for conspiracy, and two separate counts of tampering with a witness and retaliation against a witness. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . Jurisdiction of this court rests on 18 U.S.C. Sec.…