United States v. John L. Pascucci

Good Law
2 F.3d 1159·1993 WL 290900·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28181
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 199392-10698California995 words

Opinion

Opinion

2 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. PASCUCCI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10698. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 4, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion cases, John L. Pascucci appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion to return confiscated property seized from his home and office, and the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the court's initial denial of his "motion requesting recusal of judge for bias or prejudice." Pascucci was previously convicted following a jury trial for transmitting in interstate commerce a communication threatening to injure the reputation of another and attempted extortion affecting interstate commerce. Pascucci appealed his convictions and sentence and this court affirmed. See United States v. Pascucci, 943 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.