United States v. Henry Ignacio Perez

2 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Ignacio PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1993. * Decided July 8, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Henry Ignacio Perez appeals his 105-month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). 3 Counsel for Perez filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified three possible issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by not departing downward on the basis of Perez's overrepresented criminal history, (2) whether the district court erred by making a two-level upward adjustment in Perez's United States Sentencing Guidelines offense level for an express threat of death, and (3) whether the sentence imposed was unconstitutionally…