United States v. High Country Broadcasting Company, Inc.

3 F.3d 1244 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 835 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, v. HIGH COUNTRY BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and C.R. Crisler, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. No. 92-15581. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted August 13, 1993 * . Decided Aug. 27, 1993. John P. Greenspan, F.C.C., Washington, DC, and Suzanne M. Chynoweth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff-appellee U.S. of America. C.R. Crisler, Memphis, TN, pro se and for the defendant-appellant High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 A corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, --- U.S. ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. 716, 721 , 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993); see also 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1654 . An attorney appeared for High Country in the district court for the limited purpose of filing an answer and cross-complaint. See CR 3. When it became apparent that Crisler (who was not a licensed attorney at that time) was attempting to represent High Country, the…