Swanson v. Babbitt

Good Law
3 F.3d 1348·93 Daily Journal DAR 11432·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22402·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 199391-36341California3,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

3 F.3d 1348 Elmer H. SWANSON; Livingston Silver, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Mike Espy, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, * Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1993. Decided Sept. 3, 1993. John B. Ingelstrom, Racine, Olson, Nye, Cooper & Budge, Pocatello, ID, for plaintiffs-appellants. Jacques B. Gelin, Environment and Natural Resources Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before: BRUNETTI, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the time of the enactment of the Act. We hold that the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act expressly preclude the issuance of any patents on protected land after the date of the Act's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.