United States v. Presidio Investments, Ltd., Edward Sandquist v. Janet Blair, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. United States of America v. Presidio Investments, Ltd., Edward Sandquist v. Janet Blair, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant

Good Law
4 F.3d 805·93 Daily Journal DAR 11641·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23111·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 199392-15176California3,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

4 F.3d 805 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PRESIDIO INVESTMENTS, LTD., Defendant. Edward SANDQUIST, Defendant-Appellee, v. Janet BLAIR, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRESIDIO INVESTMENTS, LTD., Defendant. Edward SANDQUIST, Defendant-Appellee, v. Janet BLAIR, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. Nos. 92-15176, 92-15254. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1993. Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Thomas J. Henderson, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC, for applicant in intervention-appellant. Richard C. Henry, Tucson, AZ, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellant Janet Blair appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment against the original plaintiff (the United States of America), and in favor of Presidio Investments, Ltd. ("Presidio Investments") and Edward Sandquist. The government on behalf of appellant alleged that Edward Sandquist, her landlord, discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.