Cal. School Employees etc. v. Stockton Unified School District CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/7/22 Cal. School Employees etc. v. Stockton Unified School District CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin) ----
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION C091067 & ITS STOCKTON CHAPTER NO. 318 et al., (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV- Plaintiffs and Appellants, UMCP-2018-0006108)
v.
STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
Appellant California School Employees Association (CSEA) brought a petition for writ of mandate to stop the practice of respondent Stockton Unified School District of docking employees for salary advances when it was subsequently determined that an employee was absent and did not have available paid leave to cover the time not worked.