Gatubhai Mistry v. Qualcomm, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 202220-56178California1,181 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-56178 GATUBHAI MISTRY, Lead Plaintiff; et. al., D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01208-CAB-

AHG

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

QUALCOMM, INC.; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 16, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON,** District Judge.

Court-appointed lead plaintiff, Gatubhai Mistry and other Qualcomm

investors (Investors), appeal the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation. Procedure 12(b)(6) of their second amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.