Carlos Castillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 202220-73125California887 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ALBERTO CASTILLO, No. 20-73125

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-795-038

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Carlos Alberto Castillo (Castillo), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of a decision from the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) upholding the order from the Immigration Judge (IJ) finding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Castillo removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony, sexual abuse of a

minor, and denying his motion to remand to apply for a waiver of inadmissibility.

We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.