R.S.

R.S. v. M.N. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 2022D078444California7,473 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 2/8/22 R.S. v. M.N. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

R.S., D078444

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 18FL003487C) v.

M.N.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Blaine K. Bowman, Judge. Affirmed. R.S., in pro. per., for Appellant. Law Office of Patrick McCrary and Patrick L. McCrary for Respondent. Appellant R.S. (mother) appeals from findings and an order after hearing entered in November 2020 in which the family court, among other things, denied her request to modify custody of her and respondent father

M.N.’s two minor children and ordered that she pay $4,950 in Family Code1 section 271 sanctions. The court ordered the sanctions in part finding mother

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.