Jose Tzompantzi-Salazar v. Merrick Garland
32 F.4th 696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202220-71514California5,539 words
Opinion
Opinion
VanDyke, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE TZOMPANTZI-SALAZAR, No. 20-71514 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-196-389
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 21, 2021 * Pasadena, California
Filed February 9, 2022
Before: Ryan D. Nelson and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Karen E. Schreier, ** District Judge.
Opinion by Judge VanDyke
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. TZOMPANTZI-SALAZAR V. GARLAND
SUMMARY ***
Immigration
Denying Jose Tzompantzi-Salazar’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that (1) the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Tzompantzi-Salazar’s motion to reopen in which he raised a challenge to his charging document under Pereira v. Sessions,…