LA Investments v. Spix CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/9/22 LA Investments v. Spix CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
LA INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., B304734
Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC544662) v.
RICHARD SPIX et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Barbara M. Scheper, Judge. Affirmed. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup, Bartley L. Becker and Kenneth C. Feldman for Defendants and Appellants. The E. Johnson Law Firm, Erik L. Johnson; Houston Law of California and Troy G. Houston for Plaintiffs and Respondents. —————————— Defendants and appellants Richard Spix, Deborah Elizabeth Martin, and Law Office of Spix & Martin (collectively, the Attorney…