Wallen Lawson v. Ppg Arch. Finishes, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 9 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALLEN LAWSON, No. 19-55802
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:18-cv-00705-AG-JPR v.
PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, MEMORANDUM*
INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 4, 2020 Resubmitted February 9, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: LIPEZ,** RAWLINSON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Wallen Lawson appealed the district court’s summary judgment in his action
against PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., a paint company. Lawson challenged the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Kermit V. Lipez, United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, sitting by designation. dismissal of his claim for whistleblower retaliation under California Labor Code
section 1102.5, arguing that the district court applied the…