United States v. Mitchell Miles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202221-50105California511 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50105

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cr-02630-LAB-1 v.

MITCHELL MILES,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: LIPEZ,*** TALLMAN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell Miles appeals from his sentence for the importation of

methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. Miles pled guilty to the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kermit V. Lipez, United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, sitting by designation. importation of approximately 33 pounds of methamphetamine across the U.S. border

at the San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.