People v. Westfall CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2022C093433California2,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 2/9/22 P. v. Westfall CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE, C093433

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 18CR001330)

v.

LOGAN ALLEN WESTFALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Logan Allen Westfall filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) After examining the record and considering defendant’s contentions in his supplemental brief, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant and affirm.

BACKGROUND1

On May 10, 2018, defendant, who was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.