Ghalehtak
Ghalehtak v. Fay Servicing CA1/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2022A161795California1,959 words
Opinion
Opinion
Banke, J.
Filed 2/9/22 Ghalehtak v. Fay Servicing CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
FARID GHALEHTAK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A161795
v. (Alameda County FAY SERVICING, INC., Super. Ct. No.
RG18898872)
Defendant and Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Plaintiffs and appellants have spent years challenging the nonjudicial foreclosure of their residential property. They filed two cases in federal court in an effort to halt foreclosure, both of which were unsuccessful.2 They then
This case is appropriately resolved by way of memorandum opinion
pursuant to pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, section 8.1,…