Ghalehtak

Ghalehtak v. Fay Servicing CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2022A161795California1,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 2/9/22 Ghalehtak v. Fay Servicing CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

FARID GHALEHTAK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A161795

v. (Alameda County FAY SERVICING, INC., Super. Ct. No.

RG18898872)

Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Plaintiffs and appellants have spent years challenging the nonjudicial foreclosure of their residential property. They filed two cases in federal court in an effort to halt foreclosure, both of which were unsuccessful.2 They then

This case is appropriately resolved by way of memorandum opinion

pursuant to pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, section 8.1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.