People v. Stinson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2022D079052California3,883 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 2/10/22 P. v. Stinson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D079052

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos.

C1652157, C1506969)

AXEL GARY STINSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Hector E. Ramon, Judge. Conditionally reversed and remanded with directions. Suzanne M. Morris, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Jeffrey M. Laurence, Assistant Attorneys General, Eric D. Share and Ashley Harlen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. In Santa Clara County Superior Court case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.