Monterey Coastkeeper v. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Bd. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2022C090943California7,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

Filed 2/10/22 Monterey Coastkeeper v. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Bd. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

MONTEREY COASTKEEPER et al., C090943

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2017- 80002655-CU-WM-GDS) v.

CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL WATER

QUALITY CONTROL BOARD et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Can a court, in an action for traditional mandamus and declaratory relief, in effect order the state and local water boards to comply with the law as it pertains to water permits under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Wat. Code,1 § 13000 et seq. (Porter-Cologne Act))? In this case, the answer is no.

Undesignated statutory references are to the Water Code.

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.