Tamanaha

Tamanaha v. DroneBase CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2022B307866California8,354 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/10/22 Tamanaha v. DroneBase CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ELI TAMANAHA, B307866

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC705004) v.

DRONEBASE, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lia Martin, Judge. Affirmed. Miller Barondess, Christopher D. Beatty and Minh-Van T. Do for Plaintiff and Appellant. Prospera Law, Victor T. Fu and Shane W. Tseng for Defendants and Respondents.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff/appellant Eli Tamanaha (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of defendants/respondents Daniel Burton (Burton) and DroneBase Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.