Jahanshahi

Jahanshahi v. Rosenfeld CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2022B304076California4,523 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/10/22 Jahanshahi v. Rosenfeld CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SHAHROUZ JAHANSHAHI, B304076

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV40091)

BENJAMIN TARN

ROSENFELD,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard E. Rico and Christopher K. Lui, Judges. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part. Shahrouz Jahanshahi, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Singleton Schreiber McKenzie & Scott and Harini P. Raghupathi for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff and appellant Shahrouz Jahanshahi (Jahanshahi), in propria persona, appeals an order granting a special motion to strike or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.