United States v. Raleigh Figueras

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202221-15886California681 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-15886

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:19-cv-01267-MCE-EFB v. 2:16-cr-00045-MCE-EFB-

RALEIGH RANA FIGUERAS,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

Appellant Raleigh Figueras appeals from a district court order denying his

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, Figueras

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.