Navjot Singh v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202216-73511California617 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NAVJOT SINGH, No. 16-73511
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-937-207
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 8, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.
Navjot Singh petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
decision denying his claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
“Where, as here, the BIA…