Navjot Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202216-73511California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NAVJOT SINGH, No. 16-73511

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-937-207

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

Navjot Singh petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

decision denying his claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

“Where, as here, the BIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.