Eduardo Rodriguez v. Jared Lozano
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202221-55051California902 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDUARDO CHE RODRIGUEZ, No. 21-55051
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-02127-GW-JDE v.
JARED LOZANO, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 8, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Che Rodriguez is serving a California prison sentence enhanced
under the State’s three-strikes law. Cal. Penal Code §§ 667(a), 667.6(b). Rodriguez
alleges that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him to
concede that his 1993 New York rape conviction qualified as a strike. The
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…