Charley Zacharia v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202220-73096California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 10 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLEY ZACHARIA, No. 20-73096

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-683-010

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 8, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Charley Zacharia, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his fourth motion to reopen. Since

the denial of his third motion to reopen in 2018, Zacharia has come out as a gay

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). man, and his motion sought to reopen on the basis of changed country conditions

in Indonesia with respect to the treatment of gay men. The BIA denied the motion

because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.