Lawrence Peck v. Swift Transportation Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202220-55119California7,592 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILBERT SAUCILLO; JAMES R. No. 20-55119 RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:10-cv-00809-

VAP-OP

and

JOHN BURNELL; JACK POLLOCK,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LAWRENCE PECK,

Objector-Appellant,

v.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellee,

and

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

INCORPORATED; DOES,

Defendants. GILBERT SAUCILLO; JAMES R. No. 20-55159 RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:10-cv-00809-

VAP-OP

and

JOHN BURNELL; JACK POLLOCK, OPINION

Plaintiffs,

v.

SADASHIV MARES,

Objector-Appellant,

v.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellee,

and

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

INCORPORATED; DOES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding

PECK V. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION

Argued and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.