Anpac
Anpac v. Brittney Gardineer
25 F.4th 1111
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202220-15826California3,587 words
Opinion
Opinion
Collins, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY No. 20-15826
AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ D.C. No. Appellee, 2:18-cv-01548-
RFB-BNW
v.
BRITTNEY L. GARDINEER, OPINION
Defendant/Counter-Claimant/ Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 11, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed February 11, 2022
Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Collins
* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Insurance Law
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of American National Property and Casualty Company (“ANPAC”) in a diversity insurance coverage action arising under Nevada law.
The appellant, Brittney Gardineer, was involved in an automobile accident, and she sued the other driver, Lynette Hill…