Anpac

Anpac v. Brittney Gardineer

Good Law
25 F.4th 1111
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202220-15826California3,587 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY No. 20-15826

AND CASUALTY COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ D.C. No. Appellee, 2:18-cv-01548-

RFB-BNW

v.

BRITTNEY L. GARDINEER, OPINION

Defendant/Counter-Claimant/ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2021 San Francisco, California

Filed February 11, 2022

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Collins

* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Insurance Law

The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of American National Property and Casualty Company (“ANPAC”) in a diversity insurance coverage action arising under Nevada law.

The appellant, Brittney Gardineer, was involved in an automobile accident, and she sued the other driver, Lynette Hill…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.