Pedro Garcia-Salinas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202215-72218California616 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO GARCIA-SALINAS, No. 15-72218

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-156-721

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Garcia-Salinas seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) claim. As the facts are known to the parties,

we repeat them only as necessary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

“To be eligible for relief under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.