Alba Tobar-De Esteban v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202218-71020California1,243 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBA NOEMI TOBAR-DE ESTEBAN; No. 18-71020 et al., Agency Nos. A208-565-022 Petitioners, A208-565-023

A208-565-024

v. A208-565-025

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Alba Noemi Tobar-De Esteban seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an immigration judge (IJ)

denying her claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.