Byron

Byron v. McCray CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2022B306599California5,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/14/22 Byron v. McCray CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

KRISTINE BYRON, B306599

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18CHRO01083) v.

RENE MCCRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jonathan L. Rosenbloom, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Majd & Associates, Farbood Majd and Daniel De Soto for Defendant and Appellant. The Reape-Rickett Law Firm and Melanie Gardner-Pawlak for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________________ After Kristine Byron obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Rene McCray, Byron sought attorney fees exceeding $85,000 as the prevailing party. The trial court denied the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.