Byron
Byron v. McCray CA2/7
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/14/22 Byron v. McCray CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
KRISTINE BYRON, B306599
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18CHRO01083) v.
RENE MCCRAY,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jonathan L. Rosenbloom, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Majd & Associates, Farbood Majd and Daniel De Soto for Defendant and Appellant. The Reape-Rickett Law Firm and Melanie Gardner-Pawlak for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________________ After Kristine Byron obtained a civil harassment restraining order against Rene McCray, Byron sought attorney fees exceeding $85,000 as the prevailing party. The trial court denied the motion…