Rojan Teves v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202217-71247California802 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROJAN BERMEJO TEVES, No. 17-71247

Petitioner, Agency No. A204-271-056

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and O’SCANNLAIN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Rojan Bermejo Teves petitions for review of the denial of his motion to

reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). As the facts are known

to the parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our decision.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). After an immigration judge denied Teves’s request for voluntary departure,

Teves appealed that decision to the BIA. The BIA affirmed the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.