Pablo Hernandez-Mora v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202218-72129California467 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO HERNANDEZ-MORA, No. 18-72129

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-418-882

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and O’SCANNLAIN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Hernandez-Mora is a citizen of Mexico who has lived in the United

States for several decades. Hernandez-Mora petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to dismiss his appeal of an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge’s (“IJ”) decision to re-calendar his case. He argues that res judicata bars the

re-calendaring. We deny the petition for review.

The IJ first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.