Maria Ceja v. Derral Adams
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202219-15317California837 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA CEJA, No. 19-15317
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00291-LJO-SKO v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 9, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Maria Ceja appeals the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291
and 2253, and we affirm.
“We review de novo the district court’s denial of [Ceja’s] habeas corpus
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.” Sanders v. Cullen, 873 F.3d 778, 793 (9th…