Maria Ceja v. Derral Adams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202219-15317California837 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA CEJA, No. 19-15317

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00291-LJO-SKO v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 9, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Maria Ceja appeals the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291

and 2253, and we affirm.

“We review de novo the district court’s denial of [Ceja’s] habeas corpus

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.” Sanders v. Cullen, 873 F.3d 778, 793 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.