Juan Villasenor v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202218-72609California593 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN MANUEL VILLASENOR, No. 18-72609

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-270-862

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Juan Manuel Villasenor seeks review of an August 29, 2018,

decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that denied his third motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. to reopen his 1999 removal proceeding as untimely and number-barred. Petitioner

argues that the BIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.