Juan Villasenor v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202218-72609California593 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN MANUEL VILLASENOR, No. 18-72609
Petitioner, Agency No. A075-270-862
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 10, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Juan Manuel Villasenor seeks review of an August 29, 2018,
decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that denied his third motion
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. to reopen his 1999 removal proceeding as untimely and number-barred. Petitioner
argues that the BIA…