Gonzalo Flores v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202220-73279California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

FEB 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GONZALO FLORES, AKA Gonzalez No. 20-73279 Flores-Castaneda, Agency No. A099-828-685 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and O’SCANNLAIN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Gonzalo Flores petitions this Court to review Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his appeal claiming a due process violation by the

Immigration Judge (“IJ”). As the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). only as necessary to explain our decision. We deny the petition.

The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process in immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.