Young

Young v. Le CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2022D078208California6,088 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Tram Bao Le appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction prohibiting Le and “anyone else acting on behalf of [Le] . . . from performing any construction work” on Le’s home. The plaintiffs Bridget and Wayne Young (the plaintiffs) live across the street from Le. They filed this action after Le proceeded with construction on a remodel of her home after her remodel plans were rejected by an architectural committee tasked with considering and approving any proposed construction on properties in the planned community in which the parties live (the Architectural Committee or Committee). 1 Shortly after filing the action against Le, the plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to prohibit Le from continuing construction on her home. The trial court weighed the parties’ arguments and evidence and ultimately enjoined Le from continuing with further construction while the lawsuit proceeded. Approximately two months after the trial court issued the preliminary injunction, Le filed a motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 533 (section 533). That provision grants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.