Ramsden

Ramsden v. Peterson CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2022B310832California1,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tangeman, J.

Filed 2/15/22 Ramsden v. Peterson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

TYSON RAMSDEN, 2d Civil No. B310832 (Super. Ct. No. 16FL03195) Appellant, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

SADYE POWELL PETERSON,

Respondent.

Tyson Ramsden appeals from the order granting Sadye Powell Peterson’s request to move their daughter, H.P., from California to Illinois. Ramsden contends: (1) the trial court should not have allowed counsel for H.P. to make custody and visitation recommendations, (2) the court erred when it permitted H.P.’s counsel to introduce hearsay evidence, (3) the court applied the wrong standard when granting Powell’s request, and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the order. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.