Vicenta Hernandez-Perez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 202217-71755California712 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICENTA HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, No. 17-71755

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-086-518

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Vicenta Hernandez Perez (“Hernandez Perez”) petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) order dismissing her appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) order denying Hernandez Perez’s applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Therefore, the appellant’s motion to set argument is DENIED. asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.