Hossain Robiul v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 202221-70438California706 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 15 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HOSSAIN ROBIUL, No. 21-70438
Petitioner, Agency No. A203-678-403
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2022** Seattle, Washington
Before: BYBEE, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Hossain Robiul, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §
1252(a), and we deny the petition.