Hossain Robiul v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 202221-70438California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HOSSAIN ROBIUL, No. 21-70438

Petitioner, Agency No. A203-678-403

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Hossain Robiul, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §

1252(a), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.